Aptitude and Reasoning Questions

In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.

Statement : Should speed breakers be banned?

Argument I : Yes, data shows that number of accidents increase after putting the speed breakers.
Argument II : No, it teaches fast drivers a lesson.

The question below consists of a question and three statements numbered I, II and III given. You have to decide whether the data provided in which of the statements are sufficient to answer the question. Choose your answer from the options based on this.

How is M related to R?

I. T, the only son of M, has two sisters.

II. M’s son is the brother of the only sister of R.

III. R and T are children of M.

How many triangles are there in the given figure?

Avalanche : Ice :: Volcano : ___

In a class consisting of boys and girls, there are 45 students. If three fifth of the students are boys, find the number of boys in the class.

In a certain code language, '-' represents '+', '+' represents 'x', 'x' represents '÷' and '÷' represents '-'. Find out the answer to the following question.

9 - 14 + 15 x 10 ÷ 16 = ?

Select the odd word/letters/number/number pair from the given alternatives.

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to
be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. Some pens are pencils.
II. All pencils are erasers.
Conclusions:
I. Some pencils are not pens.
II. Some erasers are not pens.