0
Q:
A) Only argument I is strong | B) Only argument II is strong |
C) Either I or II is strong | D) Neither I nor II is strong and |
Answer: A) Only argument I is strong
Explanation:
Explanation:
Argument I is strong as it gives a proper reason as to why women should be included in combat arms – because they have already worked in this area in Iraq and other places and so it makes sense to include them officially. Argument II is weak because it talks about a general scenario in comparing an average female with an average male.
However, what if a woman with exceptional athletic ability and toughness can meet and even exceed the standards currently set for male troops, on what basis should she be denied entry into combat arms? Therefore, option 1 is the correct answer.